You must log in or register to comment.
Why are they including the samsung galaxy book, which is a laptop but not samsung phones, in a mobile phone comparison?
Info on categories. looks like they’re not even taking into account repairability in climate. I’d guess that’s why apple is scored highly.
I was wondering why on earth all these brands got full marks on climate. Absolute bogus table.
full score on tech sustainability for the company that removed the headphone jack at the same they they releases Bluetooth headphones while their earlier models still can’t call properly! Whoohoo
Any chart with this clear of a result is suspect.
Eh, if you leave out Fairphone the scoring range is realistic.
And Fairphone is specifically tailored to reach the highest realistically possible ethics standards. No wonder they crush this. The downside is that their phones are quite expensive relative to phones of comparable power.
Yeah, yeah, the Fairphone is very fair until you’re forced to use their software because they’re unable to collaborate with GrapheneOS because they leak keys, all their bootloader security is bullshit and they don’t care about making it right.
It’s true that there are issues preventing GrapheneOS from running on FairPhones, but you’re not forced to use the standard OS: you can install other ROMs on FairPhone like LineageOS, CalyxOS, iodéOS, /e/
Who leaks keys? Can you provide me some reading material?
I found this on their forums https://forum.fairphone.com/t/bootloader-avb-keys-used-in-roms-for-fairphone-3-4/83448/23?page=2
Pixel being that low with long term software support seems whack as fuck.
I mean 4/6 of the categories have very little to do with how good a phone is.
Worthless table, biased as fuck.
I find it difficult to believe every chinese phone maker is evading taxes. It’s also questionable how they manged to give an employee owned company, Huawei, a 0 for company ethos.
The fact that the actual research is paywalled, and a lot of the scores seem to be about having the correct documents on your website, makes me a little sceptical of this.
https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/about-us/our-ethical-ratings
Being employee owned doesn’t magically make you a good company
And being unionized doesn’t make you magically have higher wages, but they’re still highly correlated
Data is always beautiful if you cherry pick the data you want.
This is like judging how beautiful someone is by only looking at their hands.
Who tf is Crosscall
They make ruggedized phones. I don’t think they make normal ones.
Why the arbitrary ethiscore classification (25% for average and 60% for good? Do they just want Apple to not be red?
Dang, wish I had enough money to afford an ethical phone =(
Good news, you (probably) can! Find a flagship phone you like from a year to three ago, and go buy a gently used one. Buying things used is almost always better for the environment than buying them new.
So far I can’t find anything that fits me better than a CMF Nothing Phone.
$240.
Fairly powerful hardware for that price range.
Apparently capable of running e/OS
A shape that has actual flat, easily gripable edges, as opposed to seemingly everything else that is completely rounded.
(I’ve got a serious wrist/hand injury to my dominant hand, and that makes this last one pretty important)
Is there anything comparable for all or most of those features, in that price range, capable of being either de googled android, or running an open source and/or privacy oriented os?
I’ve attempted to look for such a phone, and basically everything is either double or more the cost.
I wish I could pay more to make a phone I am buying more ethical.
How is Google Pixel that low? They have good software support and support third party roms like GraphineOS better than nearly any other manufacturer.
Software support doesn’t excuses oor worker treatment
I’ve been using a shiftphone for the last ~5 years. I wonder where they would land on the ranking. They should als do fairly well.
Fuck. These days you can’t have nothing without Wagmi getting all up in your business!
