• Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are there any doctors in the house? Because I’d swear that looks like they used the model of a male skeleton here.

    • IsoSpandy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It is actually a male skeleton based on the pelvic bone. If this is indeed a female skeleton, then the woman will not survive giving birth to this child due to Trauma induced Post partum hemorrhage due to Lateral diameter insufficiency in a female with Android pelvis. I would have sent her to C section as soon as she went into labour, preferably even before that.

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thank you for that! I’m a computer tech, so the furthest thing from having any real medical knowledge, but I’ve seen enough to think that those dimensions just looked really wrong and comparisons to real skeletons online just seemed to reinforce that belief.

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So you’ve confirmed that the skeleton is probably human then, and not a primate?

        • Ignotum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          is probably human then, and not a primate?

          In the same way that a sparrow is not a bird

          • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            My reply was more about humans not having a penis bone, although most primates do.