- cross-posted to:
- privacy@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@programming.dev
Signal CEO Meredith Whittaker says her company will withdraw from countries that force messaging providers to allow law enforcement officials to access encrypted user data, as Sweden continues to mull such plans.
She made the claims in an interview with Swedish media SVT Nyheter which reported the government could legislate for a so-called E2EE backdoor as soon as March 2026. It could bring all E2EE messenger apps like Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage, and others into scope.
Whittaker said there is no such thing as a backdoor for E2EE “that only the good guys can access,” however.
“Either it’s a vulnerability that lets everyone in, or we continue to uphold strong, robust encryption and ensure the right to privacy for everyone. It either works for everyone or it’s broken for everyone, and our response is the same: We would leave the market before we would comply with something that would catastrophically undermine our ability to provide private communications.”
Sweden launched an investigation into its data retention and access laws in 2021, which was finalized and published in May 2023, led by Minister of Justice Gunnar Strömmer.
Strömmer said it was vital that law enforcement and intelligence agencies were able to access encrypted messaging content to scupper serious crime – the main argument made by the UK in pursuing its long-term ambition to break E2EE.
The inquiry made several proposals to amend existing legislation, including the recommendation that encrypted messaging must store chat data for up to two years and make it available to law enforcement officials upon request.
It would essentially mirror the existing obligation for telecoms companies to provide call and SMS data to law enforcement, as is standard across many parts of the developed world, but extend it to encrypted communications providers.
These power hungry tyrants just can’t STAND the idea of normal humans being able to communicate without their prying eyes spying on us. They claim this is for the purpose of protecting the public. This is plainly not true, as crime will occur regardless. They cannot eliminate crime, despite their outrageous claims, nor do they actually want to. E2EE comms will be used to plan crime sometimes. Sorry, not sorry. Privacy is worth that cost. I’ll die on that hill.
I’ll die there right with you.
Privacy is non-negotiable for me, and I’ll get violent about it if I have to. That’s my line in the sand. I’ll jump through hoops if I have to, but I’m not complying with laws that strip away my privacy.
In fact, I’m looking to host Tor nodes to help out. Screw this surveillance BS, I’ll use cryptography if I want to.
Encryption on Ham Radio / GMRS Radio is illegal in many jurisdictions… 👀
If it weren’t for stuff like banking and e-commerce, encryption on the internet would’ve probably be illegal.