FCC vs. dissent
Carr has also made it clear that will use the FCC to attack dissent. Ars Technica (12/17/24) reported:
Carr has instead embraced Trump’s view that broadcasters should be punished for supposed anti-conservative bias. Carr has threatened to revoke licenses by wielding the FCC’s authority to ensure that broadcast stations using public airwaves operate in the public interest, despite previous chairs saying the First Amendment prevents the FCC from revoking licenses based on content.
Revoking licenses or blocking license renewals is difficult legally, experts told Ars. But Carr could use his power as FCC chair to pressure broadcasters and force them to undergo costly legal proceedings, even if he never succeeds in taking a license away from a broadcast station.
Visit us @ !fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com for all the latest news on the topics of astroturfing, propaganda and disinformation.
What a bunch of snowflakes.
Costly legal proceedings for the government as well. Not just the studios.
With taxes going up and the debt ceiling raised to the moon the US government will have plenty of money to spend on freedom-destroying projects.
Not to mention all the tariffs that just pour money straight into it…
Fuck that.