• M600@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 days ago

    It’s pretty new, I’d give it a few years before trusting it.

    If I’m self hosting it, then I’ll just setup wireguard.

  • krnl386@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    Well, they forked wireguard go… I say their seriousness will depend on:

    • how well they maintain their fork
    • whether or not they continue to offer their self-hosted tier

    I’ve been burned too many times by startups who gathered up some initial money from investors and then went all corpo once the money dried up.

  • shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Looks like my telegram dealer has opened up a VPN provider startup, very weird aesthetics. Can’t say anything about the product though, I guess it’s good to have more competition in the market?

  • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    The service seems kind of generic, maybe even worse than the other generic VPN services. No statements about what they log, whether they allow p2p, no mention of port forwarding, servers in only 5 countries which you may/may not want to VPN through, etc.

    Not sure about the software, I guess they think it will be an improvement over OpenVPN/WireGuard which is debatable.

  • Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Maybe I’m just being dumb and can’t find it but…its a massive red flag for a VPN not to have a privacy policy.