• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Any use of an LLM in understanding any subject or create any medium, be it papers or artwork, results in intellectual failure, as far as I’m concerned. Imagine if this were a doctor or engineer relying on hallucinated information, people could die.

    • juliebean@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      they didn’t say they used any kind of LLM though? they literally just kept a copy of the assignment (in plain text) to reference. did you use an LLM to try to understand their comment? lol

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Its possible by “prompt” they were referring to assignment instructions, but that’s pretty pointless to copy and paste in the first place and very poor choice of words if so especially in a discussion about ChatGPT.

    • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      there is no LLM involved in ryven’s comment:

      • open assignment
      • select text
      • copy text
      • create text-i-will-turn-in.doc
      • paste text without formatting
      • work in this document, scrolling up to look at the assignment again
      • fall for the “trap” and search like an idiot for anything relevant to assignment + frankie hawkes, since no formatting

      i hope noone is dependent on your reading comprehension mate, or i’ll have some bad news

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        lmao fuck off, why put so much effort into defending the bullshit machines?

        EDIT: I honestly didnt even read your comment, too much time wasted arguing with bota and techbros, but if you mean to try to explain the user meant copying the assignment instructions then said user should never have used the word “prompt” in this context to begin with.

        • BatmanAoD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Holy shit, “prompt” is not primarily an AI word. I get not reading an entire article or essay before commenting, but maybe you should read an entire couple of sentences before making a complete ass of yourself for multiple comments in a row. If you can’t manage that, just say nothing! It’s that easy!

        • stevegiblets@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I feel nothing but pity for how stupid you are acting right now. Read it all again and see if you can work it out.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            How dare I hurt your feelings by standing up for academic honesty and responsibility. How dare I oppose automating paperwork meant to prove competence of students who will decide the fates of other people in their profession.

            Just despicable, absolutely attrocious behavior.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Just despicable, absolutely attrocious behavior.

              Yah, like when you defended literal, actual Nazis a few months back

              User notes are fun

        • Darkaga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Damn, if you’re this stupid I understand why you’re scared of the machines.

          No one in this thread is talking about or “defending” LLMs but you.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re a fucking moron and probably a child. They’re telling a story from long before there were public LLMs.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are workflows using LLMs that seem fair to me, for example

      • using an LLM to produce a draft, then
      • Editing and correcting the LLM draft
      • Finding real references and replacing the hallucinated ones
      • Correcting LLM style to your style

      That seems like more work than doing it properly, but it avoids some of the sticking points of the proper process