1. Mod of !anarchism@slrpnk.net posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @mambabasa@slrpnk.net

  • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Yeah, no. Pointing out that a quote does not support the point of view that someone is trying to use it to support is tacitly not equivalent to “going to an anarchist space to spout anti-anarchist viewpoints.” Your other examples are insufficient analogies, and I hope you can see that.

    If your hypothetical vegan space had a moderator who posted a quote of Lynda Carter saying “I try to avoid cheese, dairy, and a lot of meat, but I do like them,” and attempted to interpret that as “Wonder Woman advocates veganism,” it’s perfectly valid to call out the absence of that sentiment in the source quote. Removing such responses, especially on one’s own post, reeks of a petty reaction to criticism.

    While I typically find value in your opinions, including the ones I don’t agree with, I’m having trouble mustering respect for this one.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      From what I see, Greta was sufficiently vague on this either way. In that case, going to an anarchist space to argue for electoralism using this vagueness as a starting point seems to be sufficient reason for removal. The removed comment from the OP was not even correcting people misrepresenting Greta’s words, it was about starting an argument with someone suggesting 3rd parties (a support which I think also doesn’t belong in an anarchist space, but whatever) with the usual 2-party electoralist talking points

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Not gonna argue with you, mate. I’m just clearing out that you did not go there to correct misinformation as the person I was replying to made an analogy with, but to argue against 3rd parties and for electoralism in general.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            You’re welcome to your interpretation. In my opinion I went there to protect the space against someone who mainly wants to use it to talk about Kamala Harris and the Democrats, and is wearing a fairly unconvincing anarchist disguise and couching their message in terms of “not voting at all” without bothering to disguise it all that much.