1. Mod of !anarchism@slrpnk.net posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @mambabasa@slrpnk.net

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 days ago

    So my comment would be removed because according to the mod I provide “ideological cover for evil”, by not supporting Jill Stein, even though my rationale conforms with anarchist ideals?

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Your guess is as good as mine. My feeling is the same as yours. I don’t really have anything to add to this comment:

      https://ponder.cat/comment/794343

      I share your alarm about the censorship of discourse. It seems like there are at least three “anarchist instance” administrators in these comments who approve of it. I think they may either be jaded by a nonstop influx of trolls and noisemakers to the point that they are too tired to deal with anything disagreeable, or else they may just have not thought through enough what type of instance they want to have and what impacts this kind of policy is going to have.

      If you want an answer to your question, in other words, I think you’ll have to ask the people making the decisions.