• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    I too was shocked and a bit offended that it was called a B movie. But the budget was a freaking measly $6.4 million.
    That’s peanuts even back in 1984.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Terminator

    Indeed they accomplished a lot, an all time classic movie. Some of my friends were a bit critical about the stop motion not being very good in their opinion. But I just thought the movie was amazing.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unpopular opinion: too big budget gives a bad movie. Lower budgets forces people to be more creative and keeps the suits away that would otherwise make it a designs by committee.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        That can be the case, but IMO Terminator 2 was an amazing follow up, and it had 15 times bigger budget.

        • exasperation@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          James Cameron has a history of making great things happen with a low budget, and spending millions responsibly to actually make a positive difference in big budget films.