• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    How’s it going? The Wall Street Journal looked at five “agents” that are totally in real production use, guys. Three of the “agents” generate plans under close human supervision. Two of the “agents” are chatbots — showing how the real future of agents is simply to rebrand existing systems as “agents.” Or they’ll be “AGI” — A Guy Instead. [WSJ]

    Seriously. Everyone putting money on this is a total schmuck.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m afraid they’re putting so much money into it, that it becomes too big to fail. The behemoths will push onwards, but the smallest investors will lose.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        The end-game for AI (and Crypto, increasingly) is to incorporate into federal systems and financial systems in such a way that they can’t be removed without gutting departments or upsetting major donors.

        These are entirely parasitic organizations. They only exist to deplete the assets of the organizations they latch onto.