• ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 days ago

    It sure seems like a cool accessibility tool, but he spent the whole time taking about why he did it, and magnets, that it glosses over the “how does it work?” Part that really matters. It’s not just a keyboard, so I’m sure there’s more to it. I’m hoping he has other videos that explain the concept.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    Chording keyboards are never likely to become mainstream because they have a steep learning curve. That doesn’t mean they aren’t a great idea or that they don’t work quite well. This looks like an unusually clever implementation of the concept.

    The particular application makes a lot of sense. The combination of a wearable keyboard with extremely fast typing and text-to-speech would solve a real problem for people who can’t talk.

    Personally, I’ve played around with chording, but came to the conclusion that I actually don’t need that much typing speed. Most of my typing is either coding or writing emails. In either case, I stop to think about what I want to write often enough to keep my maximum word rate quite low. I can type around 90 wpm on a regular keyboard, which is still faster than I can compose.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    IDK if we should be calling something that requires so much training and dexterity an “accessibility device”.

    With the expense of the hardware, the learning curve for the user, and the friction of wearing all that stuff, this is going to have to solve a compelling problem to be useful. Especially when “good enough” solutions are everywhere and free.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    That was an awesome demo. I love seeing stuff like this.

    The negative comments in here genuinely surprise me, though. It’s not a bad thing if the “market” for this sort of thing is small. If people exist who want it and can benefit from it, and if the business practices aren’t predatory, then it seems to have real value.

    • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, the most important concern with accessibility devices: “Does it make me look attractive?”

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I mean, it’s the first prototype iteration of it, I’m sure there’ll be aesthetic improvements. Not to mention, this might be something some people would only use for specific situations where faster, more natural feeling conversation could be beneficial (e.g. meetings, presentations, meet and greets, etc) versus all day everyday. Lastly, even if used all day, every day, if you’re turned off from someone with a disability because they use a device like this, then honestly it’s helping that person avoid assholes.

      Edit: I’m apparently wrong, this is the 2nd iteration. But the first iteration was even bulkier and more obvious, so it doesn’t really contradict my first point.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not the guy you replied to, but am the guy below him.

        I mean, it’s the first prototype iteration of it, I’m sure there’ll be aesthetic improvements. …

        That’s all reasonable and good, post title got me because I was expecting something more refined, but that’s mostly my own interpretive fault. Came in expecting a consumer-ready, probably made in china, cool gadget, not a still-under-refinement accessibility device. As an accessibility device it makes total sense…

  • em2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is actually pretty cool. Originally created due to an email from someone who was mute.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lmfao is the guys name really “Hiro Protagonist”? And I thought 40k universe names were too on the nose

        • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          As others have mentioned, the book knows what it is, and doesn’t over reach its ability to make the silly entertaining. It’s a popcorn action movie of a book. As boatswain mentioned, the book is simi-satire, something that Ready Player One didn’t seem to understand when it ripped it off.

        • boatswain@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Snow Crash is almost kinda satire, but also not. Also, I believe, the first use of the term “metaverae”. It’s a fun read.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    This would be really useful with a personal translator device to avoid the awkwardness of saying something and waiting for the translator to repeat it in the other language. You could be wearing glasses or headphones and typing on this and having a totally natural 2 way conversation in a language you can’t speak.