• Viri4thus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Didn’t you as a country sacrifice thousands of children just so you could keep your guns for this exact moment?

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      …you’re joking, right? Electing the convicted rapist, convicted fraudster, racist, sexist, wannabe dictator that literally tried to lead a coup four years ago didn’t tip you off?

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    There goes all of what remains of their integrity.

    It just proves further and further that AI by itself is not a bad thing. It’s the intent that man pours into it, that makes it a bad thing.

    Whatever man touches, turns to rigor mortis.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It was stupid to have that in there in the first place given that an absence of politics/political bias is impossible.

    Just for one thing: the politics of the LLM’s training data will be reflected in the output. And the vast majority of the English-language corpus available will reflect Western, imperial core liberal politics. They’re pro-capitalist, pro-imperialist, anti-socialist, Western chauvinist politics.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      And the vast majority of the English-language corpus available will reflect Western, imperial core liberal politics.

      Oh, I’m sure that isn’t going to be a problem for their goals. They can always overrepresent training data from 2016-2020 and 2024-2028 to add some balance to the model’s political compass. /s