At some point I have to start wondering if Putin pays these sorts of people.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    In many ways they already are ahead. The front end is a bit wonky though, and some of the foundational features are still catching up (it’s fully functioning though).

    For one thing, they have “categories” of communities, and for another I can block all users from any instance I choose - though there is really no easy way to accomplish that while still on Lemmy proper.

    But like when you upvote something, later it remembers that but won’t show you the color. The interface is really pretty though, and solves several of the issues I had with Lemmy, like another one is that you can turn on viewing or both the upvote and separate downvote counts, which for Lemmy iirc you can only see that for comments, but for posts that only shows on the mobile site yet not on the desktop for some reason.

    The PieFed devs are super responsive, quite extraordinary so imho. It’s like they care or something (uh… cause they do, ofc!:-).

    So especially since Lemmy is not perfect either, check out both Mbin and PieFed and just see them in action without an account, just for the fun of it.:-)

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s no way Python and Flask are going to scale as well as Rust. It’s going to require more hardware to run and be able to handle fewer users.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 days ago

        The DB is all that matters. Python can scale very well through parallelization. So long as one doesn’t restrict themselves to one process, there’s really little chokepoint.

        • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Nope… CPU and memory usage matter as well… if they get exhausted, you get throttling. This also has an impact on server-costs… Why run 2 instances of something that serves 4k requests/second over one instance that serves 9k/s (just an over-exaggerating example)

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            That’s why I say if you don’t restrict to single process. As to why something which might be slightly more inefficient (it’s not going to be that much), it’s because of ease of development and pool of potential developers to help you with it.