• sensibilidades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If the algorithm is more likely to help a white servicemember than a black one, that would be a problem, no?

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It would be, but is that what’s happening?

      The article seemed to mention men and women, but nothing to do with race apart from the headline.

      • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        after an investigation by The Fuller Project and The Markup found the department’s algorithm prioritized White, male veterans. It also gave preference to veterans who are “divorced and male” and “widowed and male” but not to any group of female veterans.

        • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Im really curious on how and why it prioritizes it at all. Im probably ignorant to this but shouldn’t it just be if you are a veteran and you need help, you get it? Anything less than that would be inequity ?

          • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m guessing they have limited resources for direct intervention so use this to flag up people who have the most risk factors.

            It doesn’t sound like this is people asking for help but more trying to predict who might need it.