[Note for other users: since the other user is simply grasping at straws with argumenta ad hominem, and there’s zero valid argumentation, I’ll have my fun at his expense.]

While I can appreciate how much effort you put into the affectation of the appearance of intelligence [implied: “lvxferre is pretending to be intelligent”]

“Oh noes! How does someone DARE to disagree with Our Holy King AntiOutsideAktion? They must be stupid!”

…or perhaps I’m intelligent enough to not fall for your obvious bullshit. Not that this is some achievement, because I bet that even a dog could do it.

and how well you’ve internalized “more words = more good” as a writing style

If my verbosity deeply offends your precious, oh-so-precious sensibilities and your entitlement to abridged content, well… I don’t care.

Now let’s see if you have some actual argumentation or if you’ll keep whining [yes] this shitty ad hominem. (Onwards “AAH”)

I observe that you are still a dumb motherfucker who should just keep their idiot mouth shut.

Nope, it’s still AAH.

And bossing me around to “waaah! shut up! shut up!!! I’m going to cry if you don’t shut up!” is ineffective, by the way.

Basic reading comprehension: I was calling you and the rabble of .world accounts toxic.

I.e. you were using a non-descriptive weasel label that can be used to justify everything and nothing at the same time, to whine at LW users and me, because you have the same intellectual honesty of a hypothetical child of Elon Musk and a genderbent Spez, and can’t back up your claim.

But no, something must be wrong. People aren’t laughing at your shitty arguments because they’re bloody stupid. No - it must be because they’re stupid!

Yeah, I’ve heard of it. Where did you hear of it? In a court system? Not on a private forum the owners of which can decide who they want to join or not?

Oh look, the Musk x Spez child never heard about moral values. …and suddenly your babble makes a lot of sense.

Again, I’m not calling you a fucking moron frivolously. You’re a fucking moron.

“Again, I’m not calling you a fucking moron frivolously. You dare to disagree with me, even if reality magically bends around my belly button and makes even my inane and immoral shit become true, As if By Magic®”

AAH still ongoing… *yawns*

The word is “gullibility”

Yeah, nah. The word “gullibleness” is registered at least in Wiktionary, WordHippo, bab.la, and the spelling corrector that I’m using.

Next time that you want to prescribe against the usage of some specific word, at least make sure that the word isn’t actually valid. Otherwise you’ll keep making a fool of yourself. Although… by this comment, it’s clear that you’re willing to be the laughing stock of everyone here, right?

But hey. Let’s pretend, for a tiny moment, that your prescription held some merit here. Ah, my bad if my L3 English offends your sensibilities! I forgot that Lemmy is supposed to be the WASP e-Lebensraum, and that you’re expected to have native tier proficiency! Mayocide is threatening me and I must fight against it!

lol

Yeah, I’ve already noticed that you’re braindead. You don’t need to reinforce it.

Ordinarily I wouldn’t expect someone to brag about moderating a pedophile instance.

Finally, you found something else than argumenta ad hominem! I’m so proud of you!

And it’s still a fallacy. Changing goalposts - since the bullshit claim that ani.social contains CSAM is too stupid even for you, you’re now claiming that it’s a “paedophile instance”.

Stop making shit up. Not even the individual .ml admins agree with each other about it. It’s just that one is too stubborn to admit that he was wrong (he does the same all the time in LG), and there’s another [not in the linked conversation] clapping to what the stubborn one does.

(Blame still goes to the admin team as an entity.)

This concludes my response titled “Why you’re too much of a stupid piece of shit to engage with seriously”

You do realise that, if you did this in your own home instance, you’d be correctly banned, right? You’re supposed to disengage without arguing. (Or trying to, in your case.)

That without even considering the blatant linguistic prejudice that you showed in this comment.

---

“You could’ve gone to sleep without that.” - local saying.