misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agoDesigned by men, for men: Why sex with robots does not have appeal among womenenglish.elpais.comexternal-linkmessage-square152fedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down148file-text
arrow-up1212arrow-down1external-linkDesigned by men, for men: Why sex with robots does not have appeal among womenenglish.elpais.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square152fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBillegh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·2 months ago✅: Does what it’s asked to do ✅: Doesn’t talk back
minus-squareshalafi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoI’d kill to get my wife one, but that $1,300 tag gives me sticker shock.
minus-squareBillegh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoBut with that money you can give her the ride of her life…
minus-squareJarix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·2 months agoYour phone is probably worth that much
minus-squareBillegh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoYes, but the vibrator in your phone isn’t 75% of the user interface.
minus-squareJarix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoWas only trying to put 1300 dollars into a more palatable frame of reference
✅: Does what it’s asked to do
✅: Doesn’t talk back
I’d kill to get my wife one, but that $1,300 tag gives me sticker shock.
But with that money you can give her the ride of her life…
Repeatability is king! :)
Your phone is probably worth that much
Yes, but the vibrator in your phone isn’t 75% of the user interface.
Was only trying to put 1300 dollars into a more palatable frame of reference