• jk1006@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am from Germany and it is just sad how many people use these apps from shit companies without thinking, when suitable alternatives exist everywhere. Just use Firefox, it will work for 99,9% without any flaw. I would love to ditch WhatsApp, but could only convinge a few people to change to Signal. It is as easy as downloading a new app to prevent supporting Meta, but that’s too much effort for many :-(

  • Jimius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    if ads were normal and unobtrusive. We wouldn’t need ad blockers. Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate. I had been running an ad blocker for so many years that when a friend (who doesn’t use an ad blocker) showed me a website, the unfiltered experience was horrifying.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Im old enough to remember the internet before ads, and with ads became a thing and you had to make sure to keep your speakers low/off all the time less some screaming loud ad popped up somewhere to burst your eardrums at 2am.

      There were so many obnoxious, visual cancer ads.

      Then they became actual digital cancer by being injection points for viruses and malware, and thus adblockers became a necessity.

      And they remain a necessity to this day, for the same reason as they were 20+ years ago.

      and yet the ad servers want to blame the end user for adblocking.

      not their absolute refusal to moderate or police any of the content they deliver.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        and yet the ad servers want to blame the end user for adblocking. not their absolute refusal to moderate or police any of the content they deliver.

        This is the American way. You try to shit blame elsewhere so noone puts the onus on you to improve so you can keep a larger portion of the profit. “Fuck you I got mine” should be printed on our money lol

      • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s even worse when you consider the entire point of advertising is to deliver a targeted payload at a very specific demographic. So you can target IT folks of a specific company, etc.

    • 🎨 Elaine Cortez 🇨🇦 @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I was about to comment something similar but you said it before I did. Sometimes I’ll mistakenly open YouTube with Chrome and then I realize I messed up because I have to sit through three, sometimes one-minute long ads just to watch a twenty second video. I’ll typically just nope out and switch to Firefox. The worst thing is they’re unskippable and I swear for some of them the ad actually pauses if you switch to another tab or browser. I’m getting ads even on super old videos so I’m pretty sure it isn’t all to do with the channels themselves monetizing their videos.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        3 one minute long adds are better than those 2 hour long prageru racist propaganda videos trying to masquerade as “Educational” content

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I went to help out a friend, a few years ago, he runs vanilla Edge, I can’t believe anyone actually uses the internet like that.

    • padge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’d be okay with sites showing me unintrusive non targeted ads, but since it’s all or nothing I choose nothing.

  • knexcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

    • Libra00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I switched to Firefox when this whole Manifest V3 thing was announced, I only still have Chrome installed because it’s better for PDFs than Firefox and once in a great while i run into a site that doesn’t work right on Firefox.

      • Trashbones@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I actually really like Firefox for reading pdf’s, how is it in chrome? I’ve never actually tried chrome for that because I was still using okular back when I still had chrome installed on anything.

        • Libra00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The main issue I have with Firefox is that some pdfs have this side-by-side layout (especially rpg pdfs) that Firefox respects and I keep having to turn it off every time I load a new one. Chrome doesn’t respect it and shows it a page at a time like I want. My eyes don’t work too good so side by side the text is just too small.

          • Trashbones@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Interesting, funny enough I have sorta the opposite problem using Firefox for PDFs: I like the side by side view of two pages and Firefox always loads books with single pages, zoomed way too far in for my taste. Have you tried it for PDFs recently? It’s a new way of reading them for me, and I wonder if they’ve changed it since you used it last.

        • takeda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          67
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

          When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

          • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            62
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I would argue it’s a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

            So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that’s what I would mention.

          • micka190@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

            My IT department uninstalled it from my work laptop, and told me not to reinstall it because - and I quote: “The only browser IT officially supports is Google Chrome.”

            What makes this doubly stupid is that I’m a web developer. I literally can’t test my stuff on another browser…

          • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            I used to develop ads (non intrusive things for home depot or go RVing) and i used ad blockers. When testing, i would just run private browsing with plugins disabled…

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          4 days ago

          Officially only Edge is supported, but Chrome is tolerated. It’s a full MS environment.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          4 days ago

          At large organizations you’re generally not allowed to download much of anything without it passing through IT security and management first. If it’s a no, it will probably stay a no.

          • slumberlust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            In your experience, what large organization restricts this? I’ve worked at a few SaaS companies and a FAANG that always gave us full install rights and browser choice. Granted we are on the software side, but I haven’t experienced this at all.

          • Flagstaff@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I work for a non-profit and they are way more lenient about what we would like to install as long as the job gets done.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              Then you have bad opsec and security holes.

              This matters more for some industries than others. But this attitude lets a malicious employee install basically whatever they want in service of “the job” and you won’t even know you’re being breached until after it’s all over.

              • Flagstaff@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Well, we still have to get approval. But it just seems like they don’t mind as much. For example, I don’t know how many companies out there would be fine with installations of AutoHotkey and LibreOffice.

          • datavoid@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Just remember,it’s easier to ask for forgiveness than permission!

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Just to be clear, I mean it’s literally managed at the Group Policy level (in Windows server environments at least) and no amount of asking will suddenly give your user account permissions to be able to save files of any kind.

              You generally literally cannot download it without going through IT to get them to approve of and give your account access first.

              • datavoid@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Ya I forgot I have escalated device privileges and an admin account, which I definitely would have used for installing anything. Although I believe I can also skirt the rules using winget on a user account. That will probably get you in trouble however!

      • hunt4peas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Edge extension store still has it I think. Use it until Edge removes it as well. Then tell the IT to use Firefox highlighting the importance of adblocking.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t like my chances of swaying IT. The organisation is too big and I’ll get told I should be using Edge which is the only officially supported browser.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If you had uBlock origin already, you may have gotten a message through Chrome that it was no longer supported, so it’s been disabled, and gives you the option to remove it. I noticed you don’t have to remove it, and it can be re-enabled. However, I need someone smarter with adblockers than I to say if this is actually helpful and not hazardous.

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          People are saying manifest v2 (the old API that ublock uses) will be gone soon, which I think should effectively make ublock unusable whatever you do unless you stop updating chrome maybe (which could open you up to a ton of security issues) ? Not sure, don’t care since I’ve ditched chrome long ago

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just downloaded the Kagi Orion browser and I can install extensions from both Chrome and Firefox web stores!

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is there any firefox based browser on android where I can have easy gestures for the arrow buttons? All the firefox versions I can find require me to do this in two clicks which for the way I browse is a pain in the arse. Can I fix this somehow?

  • Nanook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Google is not an IT company. It’s an advertising company. Surprised Pikachu, it blocks ad blockers.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because they are at the end of their growth phase and have entered their squeeze until dead phase.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, but enshittification doesn’t happen all at once. And this is a textbook example of the actual meaning of enshittification.

      • Nanook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah it’s always been an ad company. And you are correct, blocking apps is new, welcome to the last stage in the ad-blocking arms race. Glad I degoogled my digital life a decade ago.

        • JimBarbecue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Hey, can you tell a little bit about your stack, what apps and services do you use? Also on phone? I guess in a decade you could work that out pretty well.

          • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Your options for phones come down to linux phones (which I haven’t heard great things about) and pixels ironically.

            Apple phones make a similar number of calls to google services as android phones simply because of how much google runs.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And if you don’t like Firefox, use one of the Firefox forks. Some of them are very Chrome-like.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ah right. But none of them are true forks, really. They still rely on the Firefox project to port features in etc.

      • azalty@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re too strict, unless you have one that’s usable by default?

          • Abnorc@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s been a while since I used it, but Librewolf had a habit of showing the bitwarden extension’s window at the wrong size.

            I was able to fix this by disabling a “resist fingerprinting” setting, but it’s annoying to have to do stuff like this in the first place. I really wanted to have an exceptions list that included certain websites for fingerprinting resistance, but I never found a clear way to do it.

            There are a few other examples of settings that I had to tweak in order to make the experience as good as Firefox.

            • azalty@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              This: fingerprinting resistance is either too strict or none at all

          • azalty@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Fingerprinting resistance is either too strict or none at all

            Cookies are removed when the browser is closed, and iirc history isn’t saved by default. It just makes it a pain for regular users

    • trn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Never has been 🔫 (at least for a couple of years)

    • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I only use chrome for my work stuff, and that’s because I work with g-suite a lot.

      Chrome fucking sucks

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wish I could say the same. Web dev. 🫡 But at least I’m using Chromium, if that’s even slightly better.

  • jam_scot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    I switched to Firefox many years ago, after their announcement I switched to Waterfox and I’m very happy with it.

  • g4nd41ph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

    I’ve started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I take this as a sign that it genuinely still works to block ads and hasn’t sold out and become malware like those others that used to be popular.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was removed because Google did away with manifest v2 for browser extensions, and uBlock Origin worked almost entirely from a feature provided in manifest v2. So it was removed because it can no longer work on chromium devices, unless the browser manually adds back in support for it. Firefox has chosen to continue to support manifest v2, so the original uBlock origin is still available. uBlock lite is still available in the chrome store, and uses the new manifest v3. It is more limited in it’s capability, but should be able to get the most obtrusive stuff. The lite version is definitely not nearly as powerful as the original.

      On a side note, it seems to me like the link still works for now. Idk how much longer that will last.

        • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think the Brave CEO recently said some Trumpy shit (in case you’re at all curious for the downvoting).

          • Bristingr@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Honestly, hadn’t logged in for a few days, so didn’t even know I was severely downvoted. Leaving Reddit has helped me not scroll through every day for hours on end on Lemmee.

            And good to know about the Brave CEO thing. I legit cannot keep up with everything.

          • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I wish more people were like you. Not everyone can keep up with everyone’s beefs (this one not so much) but it really grinds my gears when I see seemingly polite, on topic, engaging or contributing comments with no replies but still geyting down voted. Especially on a forum as thirsty as Lemmy users are for more user involvement.

            It makes me think there are too many people in the world conditioned to be preset to hate thst the fact a person doesn’t know they’re supposed to hate something is enough grounds to be shunned and hated on. Lol. It’s cool to see someone jump in and say:Hey homie, we don’t hate you we hate a person who is unrelated to the topic of the thread or the context of your comment but we do hate them enough to hate on you

            Edit: the parenthesis comment was meant to imply hating Trump monkeys is glaringly obvious. My comment was about lemmy etiquette and wasn’t about why or why not OP was getting downvoted.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s gotta be some kind of sheep brain activation; crowd following behavior. It can be very annoying sometimes.

              Sometimes you’re just voicing a neutral opinion and it gets destroyed. And by neutral I mean it’s not controversial or anything, like racism, it could just be something not exactly everyone would agree with.

              I wish people would use the down vote as Reddit once intended it to mean: off topic and not contributing to the discussion, or perhaps rude, etc. Not “I don’t agree with this”. You should explain why you don’t agree with something, or up vote a comment that already explains it.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Missing critical features:

      Filter lists only update with the extension, you cannot update them dynamically

      No making your own filters and thus no element picker for blocking annoyances on a webpage (a feature so good apple literally baked it into safari)

      No support for external lists (which means if you back up your own filters into a list you cannot easily reimport)

      No changing behavior on a per site basis

      A number of other features as well that are more strictly power user features but still really handy like dynamic filtering and strict blocking domains.

      If you have the option stop using chrome and edge, they are some of the worst options you could choose. Even outside of adblock and manifest v3 chrome is horrendous for data harvesting bullshit and edge isn’t great. If you don’t have the option because of an overzealous it dept or whatever and are forced to use it ubo lite is your best option probably and my heart goes out to you

      • Pamasich@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m a bit confused as an Adblock Plus user, why did the ublock dev drop those features? ABP uses manifest v3 too and it still has all of those. So it’s clearly not about them being impossible.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          According to Adblock Plus’ own blog post about the matter:

          With Manifest V3, Adblock Plus is required to limit how many filter lists we have available to users. We’ll have the ability to offer up to 100 pre-installed filter lists that you can turn on and off depending on your preferences. From these available filter lists, users will be able to choose 50 that they can keep turned on at any given time. We’re working to ensure that popular filter lists our users love are supported by us, and that any updates to these lists are brought to you by frequent new releases of the extension. This does mean that initially, our users will no longer be able to subscribe to any filter lists outside of what is provided in the extension.

          Re: Element Blocker:

          The Block element feature will continue to exist even after the Manifest V3 version of Adblock Plus officially launches. Manifest V3 does require us to adhere to limits with filter lists and user created blocking rules, so there’s a chance things may change in the future. However, we don’t have details quite yet! If you have any more questions about this or anything else, our support team are the best people to ask at support@adblockplus.org.

          So this says to me that baked in filter lists are now required, custom lists will not work, and Block Element is probably functioning illegally if it is indeed still functioning though that may change in the future in either direction.

          Changing blocker behavior on specific sites is the only thing in that list that I see UBO disallow and ABP not mention at all. Not sure why that was changed.

          • Pamasich@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’ve read that too, but I still have the ability to add a custom list. It says initially, so I assumed they got around that issue by now, considering it isn’t the case for me.

            I technically use Edge which afaik still allows MV2, so in case the extension somehow implements both and defaults to mv2 if available, I’ve decided to install Chrome and get ABP there to test. Even in Chrome, the ability to add a custom list is still there. As are all the other features, like manual updating. With custom list I mean both the ability to add a list per URL, and the ability to add custom arbitrary rules directly.

            I don’t really see why element blocking wouldn’t be possible or allowed under Manifest v3. Like, it’s entirely client-side. Manifest never comes into play there.

            What I can imagine is that custom lists might work that same way too, removing the ads from the page after they’ve already loaded rather than blocking the web request directly which is afaik how adblocking works in mv2. I can’t tell you if that’s the case or not.

          • Pamasich@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Probably because of the Adblock Plus mention. It’s mired in controversy because of its acceptable ads toggle and requiring ad giants to pay for it. So I can imagine people downvoting comments that put it in a positive light compared to other adblockers.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              You may be right, but whether you hate ABP specifically or not should be irrelevant to the question. The question was why other extensions - like Adblock - can have those feature but uBlock Lite can’t. What’s different?

              I’d also like to know, personally. I’d wondered the same thing.

      • OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        My work uses a web-based interface that’s very annoying to use on Firefox. I’m unfortunately tied to Chrome in the meantime, so uBlock lite is a lifesaver.

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Firefox was stubborn enough not to support H.265 till JUST recently and only on windows… Doesn’t work with my 4k security cameras as well as Chrome or Safari based browsers.

        • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          H.265 is patent encumbered. Blame the 2 or 3(?) patent pool holders (for-profit corporations, unlike non-profit -and-slowly-losing-market-share Mozilla) for not making it free to use for everyone.

          This is why AV1 is preferred, it saves bandwidth and there’s no threat of being sued into oblivion.

    • Polderviking@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The best option here is to just tank Chrome’s market share instead of making something that’s obviously not ideal, work.