• CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Well, that’s kind of shitty. I know those models can run up to five figures, and if those rules aren’t enforced uniformly across the board for everyone then it does just seem like they’re targeting a particular class of creator.

    As a side note, I find it funny that the article refers to then as “AI models” when no AI is typically involved.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    WTF is a vtuber?

    Ain’t twitch notorious for having ehags using thrist traps against juveniles?

    Shouldn’t this be done on OF and be 18 over?

    • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Okay, here’s the full explanation for you:

      VTubers are simply people using 2D or 3D avatars that move using face tracking technology.

      The issue at hand is that many VTubers have skimpy outfits but many of them are classy, i.e. not overly sexual. Furthermore, the content they produce is SFW even if at times they talk or joke about NSFW topics. Most of the time VTubers just engage in chat, gaming or reaction videos. And the official with Twitch’s new rules is that changing a VTuber model requires hiring a digital artist and a model animator aka “rigger”. These are super expensive, many of those models can cost thousands of dollars to make. So when Twitch days “cover your hips or be banned”, VTubers whose models have FROM THE BEGINNING shown hips, now have to pay artists and riggers a huge amount of cash simply to cover themselves up.

      To make things worse, Twitch’s rules are arbitrary and unpredictable. Who knows if tomorrow they’ll have to cover their shoulders? Cover their cleavage? Skirts below the knee? You don’t know, and every single time Twitch updates their TOS, VTubers have to spend money just to stay in the business. The least Twitch could do is state a fixed, immutable set of rules so VTubers can design their own outfits without fear of being targeted by Twitch’s sharia police. But that doesn’t happen. Twitch rules keep changing over and over, but mysteriously they never affect women wearing super tiny bikinis and showing off their sexy bodies in their pools and hot tubs section.

      That’s the issue. That Twitch’s TOS are not only unpredictable, but inconsistently enforced. One could say managers don’t like VTubers and engage in these practices to virtually kick them off their platform.

      TL;DR: VTubers are NOT porn. And yet, Twitch is selectively enforcing these rules against VTubers while completely allowing exactly the same - or even much more sexualized - content for IRL streamers in their bath tubs and pools section.

  • Ace! _SL/S@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Lmao, women are literally streaming in mini bikinis but VTubers must cover their fucking hips

    Fuck Twitch and Amazon for their inhuman work conditions

    • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      A while ago I got hit in the recommended streams with a random stream of some girl with absolutely gigantic milkers in only bodypaint. Probably got away with it as some sort of ‘art’ project, despite the body paint being quite bad and she was practically doing nothing on stream at all, it was just simps throwing money at her for being on screen.

      Other times there’s just girls in the ‘Just chatting’ category in tight spandex, leaving nothing to imagination, that are in suggestive poses and flaunting their gigantic tits and asses on screen. Also doing practically nothing but just posing and thanking donations.

      Twitch really has weird ass rules when it comes to this shit.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Twitch doesn’t want to get rid of it, it’s a huge moneymaker.

        They just want plausible deniability to keep advertisers, sponsors, and regulatory bodies happy enough. That’s why the rules are so weird.

      • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        On one hand, I think that kind of shit is lame AF, but on the other hand if someone wanted pay me $200/hr to paint my hog green and vacuum in green Luigi hat, you know I’d be down

        • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Vacuuming is too out of character, you need to get under the sink and do some plumbing.

          EDIT: Scratch that, I just remembered Luigi’s Mansion. Vacuuming is canon after all!