Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      9 days ago

      Its gonna be the largest embezzlement scheme in US history, that much Iā€™m certain. How much damage the pair will do to the federal gov Iā€™m not sure, but I expect there wonā€™t be much left of it once theyā€™re done.

        • corbin@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          Ā·
          8 days ago

          Personally Iā€™m betting on Teapot Dome: somebody in the Cabinet will be convicted of something like bribery, foreign influence, or electoral interference; and the cleanup will implicate multiple other Cabinet members. Trump needs to do this at some point anyway; heā€™s already done all of the Nixon things like Watergate and interfering in foreign wars, and while he attempted a Teapot Dome last time with Ryan Zinke, he needs to actually have a Cabinet member removed or convicted in order to truly be a worse president than Warren G. Harding.

            • corbin@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              Ā·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Trump would have to literally kill all lawyers. Think of the DoJ as a pile of folks who all took an oath to the law itself. When pundits complain that itā€™s being ā€œweaponizedā€, theyā€™re actually talking about a facet of overcriminalization where the DoJā€™s limited attention can be controlled somewhat; itā€™s always going to be a full-power laser that targets what the law perceives as criminality.

              In particular, the President doesnā€™t have the authority to tell the DoJ to stop an investigation, and the DoJ usually canā€™t tell individual prosecutors to stop filing motions. Trump wasnā€™t able to protect Cabinet member and Teapot Dome Candidate #2 Michael Flynn from prosecution, nor can he protect Eric Adams. The worst that he can do is a Saturday Night Massacre, where he fires lawyers until the investigations stop, and the entire pattern of special counsel is purpose-designed to prevent that from actually working.

            • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              Ā·
              8 days ago

              Because project 2025 and the mass deportations wonā€™t actually solve the problems his base is feeling, and at a certain point this kind of scandal will either be his downfall or his only option to scapegoat someone else.