Context:

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This would require acknowledging Israel as a state, which it is not.

    Nobody uses the term "state of Israel to refer to it. Demonstrated by the title of the posted article “Israel announces expansion…”. Not a single person raises the question if this means a person called “Israel” is planning to become so obese that they occlude the Gaza strip.

    The word “Israel” suffices and the .World moderators know perfectly well what is means. There is no ambiguity to hide behind.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This would require acknowledging Israel as a state, which it is not.

      Israel is a government controlling a population and a territory. It is a state by definition. To claim otherwise is fucking stupid.

      And that’s central here. A state is an “it”; unlike human beings, it has no right to defend itself. And it should be dismantled once it harms actual people, just like Nazi Germany was.

      Demonstrated by the title of the posted article

      Yeah, just like article titles demonstrate English has no articles. Pfffft.

      Not a single person raises the question

      That’s why you totally weren’t banned for “racism”, as if you were targetting actual people instead of a genocidal power structure, right? Right??? Oh wait.

      The word “Israel” suffices

      This sounds exactly the same as

      “Since I’m too stubborn to avoid falling into the sort of trap nationalists love to set up, I’ll keep helping the Zionists and clueless muppets to equate «attacks against Israel» = «racism».”

      You might not be a Zionist but you’re certainly eager to contribute with them.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        An occupation is not a state. If controlling an area and population with government would make something a state, the RSF in Sudan would be a state and Crimea would be transferred into Russia the moment it got occupied.

        Your comment is the definition of

        “This is hurting your cause - person against cause”

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If controlling an area and population with government would make something a state, the RSF in Sudan would be a state

          “But what about the RSF?”

          That said, yes, the RSF is either a state already or really close to one.

          Crimea would be transferred into Russia the moment it got occupied.

          Crimea is disputed by two states and under effective control of one (Russia). “Congrats” for proving Russia is a state.

          Your comment is the definition of // “This is hurting your cause - person against cause

          Emphasis mine. I outright compared that crap with Nazi Germany, so stop lying / assuming / bullshitting that I would be against the cause of getting rid of it.

          That said if the expression “state of Israel” makes you so uncomfortable, you could use any other expression of your choice, as long as it leaves clear that you’re referring solely to the power structure and not the population.

          Unless you’d rather keep being the zionists’ little plaything in their language game, and actually help them to spread their idiotic and immoral “noooooo, people defending the Palestinians are Nazi” babble. Because that’s what you’re doing here.

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            You are out here recognizing the RSF and ISIS as states to defend Israel and think anyone will take you seriously?

                • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  You recognize Israel thus you defend Israel.

                  A state is an instrument of oppression dammit. To recognise “X is a state” is NOT the same as defending X.

                  So, again, stop being a liar. (Actually it’s worse, you’re being a dumb fuck.)

                  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    58 minutes ago

                    Saying people need to recognize Israel to advance the Palestinia cause is defending Israel. Palestinians do not recognize Israel for a reason.