• notfromhere@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I agree with the socialism part, but I’m not picking up on the authoritarian overtones. I would want a system like this to be flexible to meet the basic living needs of each person and would view it as more of a stepping stone to a post-scarcity society.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The whole social credit thing sounds like something that could easily be taken away depending on your political beliefs

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        These things already exist. Credit scores determine whether or not you can buy a house in certain neighborhoods. People are being deported for their political beliefs. The US has the largest prison population on the planet, both per capita and sheer numbers. When/if you do get out of prison, felonies stay with you the rest of your life, even for something ridiculous like marijuana possession.

        You’re worried about a hypothetical when there’s the real thing right in front of you.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree largely, but we still live in a society where you don’t need to pass a credit score to get groceries.

          How will removing that not be seen as authoritarian?

      • notfromhere@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s where things like decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) and smart contracts could come into play. Maybe we could start implementing this without ever involving the government at all.