I started to notice a trend on Mastodon and Lemmy where the person criticize a news source for writing a minimally biased headline.

Sometimes, I even notice a person posting a article on Mastodon to provide commentary, and in the replies you would find a person criticizing the headline for not using loaded words.

Is there is any specific reason for people doing this?

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I saw the source and thought the same thing. The link isn’t as bad as some I’ve seen, so I think the complainer was out of line in that specific instance, but some are worth pointing out.

    In American News, white people “protest” and black people “loot and riot”. They could be doing the same thing, but that’s what we call it.

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Personally, I don’t think the commenter was wrong to point it out. This isn’t an even conflict and Israel is not only attacking Hamas. “Pro-Palestine” implies you’re choosing a side in this conflict and allows people to form a bias. Anti-genocide showcases exactly why the majority of people are against the war.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        But I don’t think it paints anyone in an unfair light. Now, if they called them antisemitic, anti-Israel, or anti Jewish rioters, that would be painting them in an unfair negative light, but when you get a relatively neutral term even though you would prefer an edgier one, that’s not the journalists fault.

        I would’ve rather been known as “Heroic defender of the marginalized and downtrodden”, but I guess I’m ok with just “Democrat” in the headlines.

        • Sundial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          I see where you’re coming from but at the end of the day “Pro-Palestine” implies that these people are only protesting it for Palestine, and not the genocide. If the situation were reversed where Palestine was committing a genocide against the Israeli people then these people would not be “Pro-Palestine”. Remember, a lot of people around the world think that Palestinians want to ethnically cleanse the Jews (which is 100% not true). They use this as an excuse to justify what Israel is currently doing. This is what I meant by saying it has an implicit bias. It’s a very polarizing situation and the media is making it worse by labelling everyone either Pro-Israel or Pro-Palestine. We’re meant to believe that by picking a side you forsake the other. Which is not the case for a lot of people.