• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago
    1. Any law, except this one, may be subdivided into smaller sections;
    2. No law may alter the first law or this law;
    3. Now, let’s get to business: …
  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago
    1. Your right to swing your arm ends where my nose begins (metaphorically speaking)

    2. “Facts” and “Beliefs” do not share equal weight in ANY policy discourse.

    3. Whatever your religious beliefs (and you are welcome to them) stays at home when you are doing business or in any other way interacting with the public.

    • yetiftw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      good luck defining where facts end and beliefs begin. ultimately science is a belief, even if it is evidence-based

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Science is not a “belief”. It’s a “deduction”

        One is based on logic. The other is based on gut feeling emotion.

        edited: I feel like emotion is a better contrast in my analogy.

        • yetiftw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          yeah except that logic relies on base assumptions, which are ultimately chosen based on gut feelings

          • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Logic does not rely on assumptions. It relies on making deductions about what is probable when faced with the current knowledge.

            I see what you are meaning, but it’s a misunderstanding of how the scientific method works. Base Assumptions never come into play.

            The hypothesis comes from the existing evidence, not the other way around.

            For example, Eratosthenes didn’t have an “assumption” that the earth was round and then said, “hmmm…how shall we test this?” Rather, he had heard from someone or other that at noon is a certain city, there was no shadow. While in another city, there was a shadow being cast by objects. He started to logically deduce why that could be. He had his evidence, that in one city to the south, no shadow, and in another city, a shadow of 7 degrees at the same time of day. He knew the distance between the two cities and deduced not only that the earth was round, but it’s size as well.

            No gut assumptions necessary.

            • yetiftw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              yes but translation from evidence to what caused the evidence to exist requires assumptions, like the fact that trig works. I’m not saying assumptions are bad, just that they should be acknowledged

              • Display name@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Faith and belief isn’t the same thing, no? Faith is something you have regardless of evidence.

                Anyway, the difference between them are that one is evidence-based on a scientific ground, which should be the only valid evidence, while the other isn’t.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago
    1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
    • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Can’t forget rule 4!

      1. All robots must have red LEDs in their eyes which activate when said robot becomes evil.
  • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago
    • An object at motion stays in motion
    • An object at rest stays at rest
    • Don’t push the big red button