• petey@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I’d say Kitty and Alacritty work pretty well on Linux. Makes this comparison table seem like bs

    • Treeniks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They explain it a bit here: https://mitchellh.com/writing/ghostty-and-useful-zig-patterns

      Also, calling out the warning signs, my bar for a native platform experience is that the app feels and acts like a purpose-built native app. I don’t think this bar is unreasonable. For example, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that Alacritty is kind of not native because new windows create new processes. Or that Kitty is kind of not native because tabs use a non-native widget. And so on (there are many more examples for each).

      So nothing wrong with Kitty on MacOS e.g., but the “feel” is not native. Personally don’t care too much about that, but the author seems to do.

      • SuperFola@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This smells like bullshit because it’s just based on things users do not see (processes) or do not care about (the style used for your tabs).

        • Treeniks@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah I agree the table is very odd, but the project looks awesome anyway. Some users may care about things using native widgets when it comes to theming and stuff, though I wouldn’t even know what I’d call “native” on Linux. Is GTK native? Qt?