Disclaimer: Fuck the rich and please consider reading 1 paragraph before you go to comments to explain how I am a bootlicker. Thank you Ł©(ā¢Ķ ź“ ā¢Ķ)Ł ĢĢā
For context, I generally report all calls to violence, no matter who the āvictimā is, whether they are a public figure or an anonymous user. I didnāt even register that the person I was ādefendingā was richāIām just aware that calls to violence are against most instancesā terms of service (due to legal threats). Genuinely sorry seahorse! I wish you just had something in your instance sidebar or even spoke to me instead of jumping to ban and ālibā insults!
Unverifiable information you will have to take my word for (per community rules)
Apologized to seahorse and got:
My own personal curiosities only adjacently related
Correct me if Iām wrong, isnāt this a bit of an abuse of federation? This is the same admin that pulled the move with the doxxing of Nick Fuentes. By banning users for reporting content that may violate our local instance rules, seahorse is making our local instances harder to moderate for our admins. (Honestly I respect the commitment to the running a very open and uncensored instance, but until Lemmy has the option to only report to local admins versus local & federated authorities, this may not be the best strategy?)
Anyway, this is pretty interesting. Iām honestly not too pressed about this (mostly I will miss !theonion@midwest.social) and curious what yall think. :)
It really feels like the mod tools of lemmy need to be a bit more fine grained. A button to ignore all further reports from a person would have gone a long way here.
as an admin, what would you think about separate buttons to report to local mods versus the mods of the communityās host instance?
Iāve already suggested similar myself
hell yeah im so big brain (im not) thanks for your response!
Iād also like the opposite, when a moderator is plainly being an asshat, and their admins need a heads-up.
I think that would be a very good feature, Also I honestly think Federated reports should have user-data stripped out of them. Just like on Mastodon, it prevents harassment and abuse from malicious remote servers towards the users who reported the content. Probably also donāt show it to community mods, I was abused and harassed relentlessly by a malicious community mod who used my reports as fuel for more abusive behavior.
i.e. Instead of a report coming from me on this server, youād see it as from lemmy.dbzer0.com, and for mods on the same server it would say ālocal user reportā but still show the name to admins.
Admins could configure if local mods could see report names but remote mods and remote server admins would just see domain name.