![Canāt remember exactly where or about whom I reported but it was to the effect of āsomeone please kill [this person]ā](https://lemmy.cafe/pictrs/image/d2276497-bd1c-4d25-9a79-135799319e54.webp){kind=link}
Disclaimer: Fuck the rich and please consider reading 1 paragraph before you go to comments to explain how I am a bootlicker. Thank you Ł©(ā¢Ķ ź“ ā¢Ķ)Ł ĢĢā
For context, I generally report all calls to violence, no matter who the āvictimā is, whether they are a public figure or an anonymous user. I didnāt even register that the person I was ādefendingā was richāIām just aware that calls to violence are against most instancesā terms of service (due to legal threats). Genuinely sorry seahorse! I wish you just had something in your instance sidebar or even spoke to me instead of jumping to ban and ālibā insults!
Unverifiable information you will have to take my word for (per community rules)
Apologized to seahorse and got:
My own personal curiosities only adjacently related
Correct me if Iām wrong, isnāt this a bit of an abuse of federation? This is the same admin that pulled the move with the doxxing of Nick Fuentes. By banning users for reporting content that may violate our local instance rules, seahorse is making our local instances harder to moderate for our admins. (Honestly I respect the commitment to the running a very open and uncensored instance, but until Lemmy has the option to only report to local admins versus local & federated authorities, this may not be the best strategy?)
Anyway, this is pretty interesting. Iām honestly not too pressed about this (mostly I will miss !theonion@midwest.social) and curious what yall think. :)
You might want to look up the definition of corporal punishment, because you are absolutely opposing corporal punishment when you report a post that advocates violence as punishment.
Being opposed to corporal punishment by default is not a bad thing.
goodness :( please read the post. admins. can get. in legal. trouble. for. calls. to. violence.
the report is just me giving them the heads up that the content exists, nothing more, not me trying to censor others, not some political statement, and certainly not a moral one.
admins are free to ignore my reports. in fact, i hope they do, and perhaps let me know when and where they are not necessary.
i have read your post. PLEASE read mine. š
So what youāre saying is you donāt really care if thereās call for violence and are indifferent to people being killed/attacked because of it. All you care about is protecting the instances and its admins legally?
sure. whatever. not the most accurate description of what im saying but a lot damn closer than other people have been.
i donāt understand why you and others think there is such a moral mesage behind clicking the report button. itās two clicks and a text field to say āhey, found this, wanted to bring it to your attention but itās not up to me in the end.ā
Personally when I report things its mostly because of my own moral responsibility to support the removal of certain harmful content. Ofc I also want to see lemmy communities thrive but thats just part of it.
Interesting! Genuinely surprised to hear these differences from my perspective. :)
Obviously moral responsibility does play into it for me too to a degree, for example one of the big ones for me on Lemmy is its issue with sexism so I report A LOT of comments for that. But of course, that always is in reference to the community or instance rules that forbid misogyny and hate speech.
There arenāt any my instance doesnāt defederate, but if there were any communities that actively supported misogynistic speech? I would have no reason to want those communities/instances of Lemmy to succeed and I would rather work to get that instanced defederated or that community erased than bother with trying to fix the issue by reporting individual posts to inattentive mods.
Thanks for your insight.
Sorry I couldnāt keep up with what seems like a constantly changing basis for reporting.