None of you understand the reality here.

They’re adding deepseek at the CPCs urging for 4 reasons:

1. Advertising a feature

2. Asians are more receptive to Ai than westerners

3. National pride

4. The cpc wants to dramatically increase its visibility of its citizens, with real time judgment and ‘nudging’ of their views.

Imagine having Ivanka trump in your phone 24/7 telling you what’s good and how you should believe.

This is the ultimate dream of the cpc made manifest.

I’d hold off, the market is a shitshow right now.

Battery life is great on Linux, had it running manjaro like a champ.

Talked to him for a bit at my last startup, he invested. He’s sharp, very market focused.

Also he believes in the GPGPU market hardcore.

He’s not one of the marketing trash who drove intel into the ground.

Then it should also coelescce, particularly since it doesn’t have the em force to keep it repelled, the universe should be dominated by massive dark matter black holes.

Yes, there’s math that explains part of the distribution, but also there is 0 force opposing any collapse we’d have a lot more neutron stars and other degenerate matter catalyzed by dark matter.

We have hypotheses like this when our observations don’t make sense and we need to explain them, it’s definitely a possibility but we still have room to understand the large scale physics at play.

Yes, it would just be surprising because, gravity should make them not be evenly distributed.

The whole thing with dark matter is that it’s this magic stuff that causes gravity but isn’t affected by it, which… is not how gravity normally works.

Though there is still room for it, we just need a better framework other than “I added 3 and 5 and got 12, so obviously I must mean to add 3 and 5 and 4 too”.

The main way you’d see that kind of microlensing is if they aggregated.

But given the way gravity works, they should aggregate, otherwise why call them black holes?