It was shifting left previously. Nobdoy complained.

They are closing nothing here. It’s the equivalent of the developer doing local commits and delaying the public pull request.

Nextcloud

They might be confusing correlation witu causality. A bit biased and confused.

An LLM is not a “top AI” for beating games. It’s a language model…

It’s like saying “the fastest Bugatti in the world struggles to float on the water”.

I’m also trying to figure out a setup using Docker. What’s the recommended way of connecting the container to a VPN? Ideally I want to bind the qbittorrent container to a VPN while the rest of the machine is not connected to the VPN.

Then you just answered your question yourself…

Brings me back to my previous comment as to why you ask this question. Seems like you’re just here to make a statement rather than post a genuine question.

Really? Why would it be a bad idea to bring a sign to a protest? Can’t think of any reason.

If users started to switch to it, how would the primary instance handle that level of traffic?

They can’t. Not without enshittification and monetization. But I suspect that that is their goal. They have no interest in federation, not even on the future roadmap. The developer also stated elsewhere that he won’t support self-hosting officially, and it only became a thing after long back and forth in the community. I already know where that project will go and I don’t like it.

Element is run by a for-profit company.

It’s not federated, no video call, no screen share. Pretty useless so far.

Element is run by a for-profit company. Plus, it’s not even remotely similar to Discord. Apples and oranges.

Wrong community mate. This isn’t a place for politics. This is a place for honest questions.

Lost on Lemmy?

Disney should focus on making good original content again instead of rebooting everything a second and third time.

Just reading it is already profitting from the written work. The author should have the freedom to decide whether they want monetary compensation for that or not. Isn’t this a free world? You should respect it when people decide to publish IP under permissive licenses. It’s their work. They can decide. Everyone who is against this and for piracy needs to have their moral compass checked by looking in the mirror. This is a free world, if you like it or not.

The entire open-source scene grew out of that exact system before LLMs even existed. What are you talking about?

Also, just because somebody has the right to make their code open-source doesn’t mean that everyone should be forced to do the same. If you decide to make a living by writing books under a permissive license you should be able to do that. This is a free world. Nobody is forcing open-source developers to make the code proprietary. But people like you feel to be in the moral right to force the opposite to others.

Why, so you can profit from it?

Why do you ask this question here? Do you actually want to know?

Matrix is almost an alternative to Discord as much as PeerTube is an alternative to Disney+.