Come now, he was always about consing chodes into listsā¦ Given his excessive self-seriousness, I doubt heās taken the time to pick up the skill of juggling them in the years since
Come now, he was always about consing chodes into listsā¦ Given his excessive self-seriousness, I doubt heās taken the time to pick up the skill of juggling them in the years since
If you step back and think about it, it is rather absurd that a time-sharing multi-user OS essentially took over for personal devices
alas, there is no honor or glory to be had from winning the meme race
I canāt help but feel like for Ellison in particular, he must have given himself no choice but to believe this stuff is more capable than it is. Heās 80 years old now, and if building towards honest-to-god āreal AIā wasnāt what his whole career was about, then what was the point? The twilight of the older generations of tech executives is going to be its own special kind of pathology.
Not sure where this came from, but it canāt be all bad if it chaos-dunks on Yudkowsky like this. Was relayed to me via Ed Zitronās Discord, hopefully the Q isnāt for Quillete or Qanon
I feel like before Redbox went under, it was also a dumping ground for this sort of thing. For instance, that mid-budget Western āRustā where Alec Baldwin killed the camerawoman on set felt like it was destined for this sort of distribution strategy. Whoās clamoring to go out to the theater to see a Western with Alec Baldwin these days? But it might stand out among all the other slop when youāre looking to turn your brain off on a Saturday night.
See also the rise of the āgeezer-teasers,ā where a random 80s/90s action star signs up to appear in the first and last 10 minutes of a generic action movie filmed someplace inexpensive, most likely eastern Europe or southeast Asia. There were a lot of those. Perhaps my favorite, that I still want to watch someday, was Danny Trejo and Danny Glover in āBad-Ass 2: Bad-Asses.ā
Iām guessing these people were JAQing off hard enough that they got kicked out of their local Oxford-style debate org and had to start their own.
I feel like āqualiaā is both an interesting concept, and a buzzword that has rapidly grown to indicate people who need to be aggressively ignored.
he would continue to look like shit
The British elected a guy who wears a mop on his head. You cannot convince me that is his actual hair.
I still have occasional intrusive visions of Johnson busting into an unattended supply closet in the Palace of Westminster to steal a fresh mop head, shouting, āBLOODY LABOUR NICKED ME TOUPĆE!ā
Iām employing the working hypothesis that gamers are particularly easy to trick with rage-bait because of short-circuited dopamine loops. One must compulsively game, but if the game sucks, then there must be an explanation thatās as simple as the game. Iāve got a couple of buddies who are always whining about the new Call of Duty, but always pick it up every year anyway. This correlates with all the anti-woke misogyny freakouts, tooā¦ their gaming is on a spectrum with their porn consumption, and a lot of these weirdos are probably alt-tabbing back and forth as urges arise.
I was rather shocked that Epic took down UT2003/2004 from the storefronts where it still existed, on top of already failing to deliver the new-generation Unreal Tournament. Seems like a wholly thoughtless way to bury their history, but maybe there were some expiring licensing rights tied up in that? I seriously have to doubt that, though.
bwahahaha āmost reasonable operationalizations; conditional upon being e/acc.ā Why does this person make me think of nasal, vaguely whiny prequel Spock?
āTensor Templarā lmao. Hey buddy, what did the Knights Templar do, besides banking?
Anybody remember when they were writing off unsold dolls and hauling them straight to the landfill? That has to be a few years ago now.
I sharply disagree, but this is a subtlety thatās lost on a lot of people. The tech industryās success since at least the 1990s, up until the mid-2010s, was about making technology easier for the individual user, a more accessible and (potentially) more efficient means for accomplishing many routine interactions. Tech devices existed as tools in service of the will of the end user, and if you were really willing to drink the kool-aid, extensions of the user themselves, Jobsā ābicycle for the mind.ā
The expectations being cultivated for AI now set it up as an entirely separate entity from the end user, and one that is potentially more capable at some point in the ill-defined future. This opens the door toward resources being reallocated towards this nebulously powerful entity, and the allocation of shared resources is at the very core of politics. This is a hard pivot away from how technology was designed before! You and I know itās a load of complete hogwash, but that doesnāt prevent the potential bamboozlement of the lagging generation of policy-makers. Even someone as relatively young as Kamala Harris or her likely successor Gavin Newsom could be roped into this bullshit, if only because they know where their biggest donation checks come from.
The future in which the current crop of AI retailers enjoy a successful political program is no longer one where a rising tide lifts all boats. But, for the time being, it can still be pitched as such due to deeply embedded cultural expectations.
āMy heavens, our self-regarding supremacist ideology canāt possibly imply violenceā¦ can it???ā
āThe Fancy Induced Burgerā is what you nickname your baby if your pregnancy goes past the due date
I was happier when I had no idea who Patrick Soon-Shiong was, but Patrick Soon-Shiong was much happier still
I think one thing to understand is that most of his casual audience very likely engages through watching clips, not sitting through whole interviews. The reasonable, mainstreamable stuff gets clipped out and perhaps you run across it sarching for something else, or itās algorithmically fed to you because of your interest in an adjacent topic. Clips of the weirder, creepier manosphere/Alex Jones/Art Bell guests donāt get surfaced as readily, at least until youāre down the rabbit hole, so Rogan himself ends up having a veneer of reasonability and respectability that he doesnāt really deserve.
Same goes for Trump rallies, or probably almost any major political speech now. Thereās a front line of people who will watch the whole thing, but then they recirculate specific clips based on how they want to portray the subject.