This is the same type of criticism the paper made. The real intent behind the saying is given random output (where all outputs have nonzero probability) eventually you will create anything/everything.

Its a thought experiment around infinity, probability, and art.

Yeah, basically summed up to “were too small an operation or lazy to manage our data, so a improved search/summary tool works for us”. This kind of approach isn’t going to work in a loooot of environments and there is a lot of value in consistent and reliable data.