Which is good right? Fosters both competition and market resilience.

Clearly not all murder is illegal. And the whole reading thing tracks. They have systems out there that will help you learn.

Lives are more important than shareholder value and no feduciary lawsuit would ever rule otherwise.

Yes I think extra-judicial punishment is a fitting end when judicial punishment fails to even start. Again, what’s legal and what’s moral are not the same. Luigi took one life sure, but how many lives do you think will be saved because insurance executives are a little more scared of looking like murderes to their customers? Hundreds? Thousands?

If I’m making decisions that directly lead to the death of my customers in exchange for monetary gain then yes please lock me up.

Cog? The guy was the CEO of the insurance company with the highest denial rates in the industry. He wasn’t subject to this system he was actively designing and lobbying for it.

Morally it’s murder either way. Just because you found a legal loophole doesn’t make it not murder morally. There tons of actions that are legal but are morally reprehensible.

It’s not a complex calculation. He regularly traded other people’s lives for his own money.

Just because there’s a few steps between your decision and someone’s death doesn’t mean your decision didn’t cause their death.

With the expected costs of a web browser by the general public being $0, what company would want it that isn’t going to do that? Even Firefox survives off ad revenue. There is no “browser market”, there’s an ad market.