• 1 Post
  • 150 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 14th, 2024

help-circle



  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.socialtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The risk just increases with multiple partners, regardless of “exclusivity.”

    And no, the second does not get solved by time management and communication - you literally have less time to spend with each wife.

    Out of one year, if you have 100 hours to spend, a truly equal amount of time is 50/50. The man gets 100 hours of intimacy, but each wife is starved of those 50 hours. If you increase the amount of time you can spend to 200 hours, then an equal split is now 100/100 and each wife is starved of 100 hours of intimacy. There is no way to prevent this with multiple partners.


  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.socialtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ignoring the sexist reasoning behind polygamy, there are practical ones too.

    I have one dick.

    Its risky to have sex with multiple partners. The more partners, the more that risk of STIs increases.

    The amount of intimacy (not sex, intimacy) a spouse gets with a partner decreases the more spouses one has. At some point “starvation of intimacy” will occur, leading to a breakdown in the relationship.

    Edit: I’m sorry y’all. This conversation is gross and full of bigoted male-centric talking points. Polyamory is one thing, but polygamy is fully about the man. If you refuse to see that part, you’re just an asshole trying to justify an ancient means of having power over women.













  • Gluons do not have a half life?

    Remember that they DO make an exchange - Gluons have color charge - red, green and blue. QCD is the magical realm of color charge.

    The hardest part for quantum anything is grasping the “probability aspect” means spontaneous things can happen. In the case of QCD, as you put energy into separating quarks it becomes infinitely more likely to pull particles out of the vacuum than to separate them.

    QCD is involved in fusion in a similar way - two protons will oppose each other with infinitely more force the closer they get because their charges are repulsive. The faster two protons are flung at eachother, the probability of the quarks binding increases.



  • Can you imagine being those antelope being hunted by early human ancestors -

    “Ok, bob, we just bolted at 40mph for a minute or so, they’re not going to find us again.”

    “Clarice, you said that the last 8 times and they still showed up! They’re unnatural! They just keep following and following us! Alex smashed his shin that last run, and I don’t know how many more times I can run myself! We’re doomed Clarice! Doomed!”


  • Strong force is the same.

    I don’t know if it’s shorter than the weak force, but you gotta be in an atom’s nucleus to experience it

    Edit: i just realized I may have confused people - strong force has a limited distance, not that it’s because they decay.

    Edit 2: If i ever got a PhD or master’s even in Physics, id probably write a book on how “The Universe Demands Laziness.” Because pretty much everything in physics ends up with a system taking shortcuts to save a little bit of energy.