youtube-local over a Mullvad (other services like Proton or IVPN are great as well) works really well for me
youtube-local over a Mullvad (other services like Proton or IVPN are great as well) works really well for me
Everything works except Thunderbolt/USB4 and Video output via USB-C
I wouldn’t use it as a NAS if you plan to use NVMe SSDs for fast storage (since you can’t connect them via USB4), but if you only plan on using SATA SSDs or mechanical drives, USB 3 should be fine. Other than that, everything you would need in a server is there and works flawlessly.
You can install Linux on ARM-based Macs too:
https://asahilinux.org/
!asahilinux@lemmy.world
Nope. Since the entire database is contained in a single file, it can’t sync multiple edits properly, leading to sync conflicts. Because KeePass was built around local database files, whereas Bitwarden uses actual synced databases, where individual updates can be uploaded, instead of causing conflicts or overwriting the entire db.
Bitwarden can’t be compared to KeePassXC. Bitwarden is fundamentally built around a sync server, whereas KeePass is meant to exclusively operate locally. These are two very different fundamental concepts for, you know, how to actually store and access your passwords.
mastodon.social exists
It’s literally there to take the choice away from new users