db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 month agoThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1248arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1248arrow-down1imageThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 month agoThey are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
minus-squareTh4tGuyII@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 month agoConsidering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
minus-squareo7___o7@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month ago“Decepticons” is right there!
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agowe call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoYes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.
They are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
Considering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
“Decepticons” is right there!
we call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
Yes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.