data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dfba/8dfba53db119436407fa59133ccb998179f576a0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e766/0e7669fbf07463b68c27109901a6ab9cc5a08fee" alt=""
those opinions should come with a whiplash warning, fucking hell
canāt wait to once again hear that someone is sure weāre ājust overreactingā and that star of david passbooks voter ID laws will be totes fine. Iām sure itāll be a really lovely conversation with a perfectly sensible and caring human. :|
heh yup. I think the most recent one (somewhere in the last year) was something like 12-bit rsa? stupendously far off from being a meaningful thing
Iāll readily admit to being a cryptography mutt and a qc know-barely-anything, and even from my limited understanding the assessment of where people are at (with how many qubits theyāve managed to achieve in practical systems) everything is hilariously woefully far off ito attacks
that doesnāt entirely invalidate pqc and such (since the notion there is not merely defending against today/soon but also a significant timeline)
one thing I am curious about (and which you mightāve seen or be able to talk about, blake): is there any kind of known correlation between qubits and viable attacks? I realize part of this quite strongly depends on the attack method as well, but off the cuff I have a guess (āintuitionā is probably the wrong word) that it probably scales some weird way (as opposed to linear/log/exp)