Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    ā€˜They wish this technology didnā€™t existā€™: Perplexity responds to News Corpā€™s lawsuit

    ā€œThere are around three dozen lawsuits by media companies against generative AI tools. The common theme betrayed by those complaints collectively is that they wish this technology didnā€™t exist,ā€ said the Perplexity team in the blog. ā€œThey prefer to live in a world where publicly reported facts are owned by corporations, and no one can do anything with those publicly reported facts without paying a toll.ā€

    I wish the AI bros at Perplexity and elsewhere a very cope and fucking seethe.

    Okay, quick personal sidenote:

    With how much misinformation, manipulation, outright theft and other horrific shit this AI bubble has caused, I suspect weā€™re gonna see some attempts at an outright ban on AI. How successful theyā€™re gonna be, I donā€™t know, but at the bare minimum itā€™ll enjoy some popularity on the political fringe.

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Burglars telling homeowners to cope and seethe when questioned about their possession of crowbars at time of arrest.

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      they wish this technology didnā€™t exist

      this is supposed to be invalidating, but likeā€¦ yes? whatā€™s wrong with that?

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      They prefer to live in a world where publicly reported facts are owned by corporations, and no one can do anything with those publicly reported facts without paying a toll.

      Yea, down with corporate IP trolls, information gatekeepers and idea landlords! Anyway, what was Perplexityā€™s business model again?

  • maol@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    More AI generated shite from Ireland: Transport for Ireland decided, for some reason, to use AI for its Halloweā€™en themed ads. This was roundly complained about online. Then someone decided, for genius reasons, to ring Liveline and complain about it.

    For those who are unfamiliar, Liveline is a national phone-in show presented by JOEEEE DUFFY, who could start a fight with a brick wall. Every episode is about either a petty grievance or a real horror story. Itā€™s like a national whinge-in. I am going to listen to the episode (available here) and see if there are any highlights.

  • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    Actual message I got while renewing my insurance plan last night. Thank you for adding a shitty chat bot which will give me false information about my life and death decisions, bravo.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      This tool solely exists so that you can ask it questions and get assistance, but also we disavow any responsibility for the answers to the questions we just told you to ask it. Has this kind of clause been held up in court anywhere? Like, Iā€™m sure it has but it seems like the same logic would be ridiculous in any other context. Like, consider the fraught legal history of the anarchist cookbook.

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    In other news, thereā€™s been a statement on AI training thatā€™s racked up over 10k signatures, which is unsurprisingly lambasting the rampant stealing that went into creating the autoplag machines:

    Now, Iā€™m way too much of a fan of sidenotes, so Iā€™ll whip one out:

    Beyond simple content theft being publicly lambasted, I suspect that even licensed use of artistsā€™ work for gen-AI will ignite some controversy - if Eagan Tilghmanā€™s run-in with controversy last year is any indication, any usage of gen-AI, regardless of context, will be met with hostility.

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Update on LLM reviewer situation:

    PM is down to let us pitch them our argument. Good news: PM seems like a cool person, is open minded, and is being pretty frank about the forces at work here. Bad news: taking action on this will open a whole can of worms, so any proof has to be ironclad. After conferring with our local grant wizards, the battle plan is to crank out a 15 minute pitch consisting of:

    • a 2 min elevator pitch of our tech, highlighting what the reviews mangled
    • intro to LLMs for people who know what glycosylation is
    • intro to semiotics for the same
    • show how transformer architectures transform symbols into symbols to produce text-shaped objects without actual intent, ideas, or context (and why ā€œautomated AI detectionā€ is also bullshit).
    • show a few examples of plausible-at-first-glance gen-ai slop (the nonexistant turkish fortress, mouse dck, etc)
    • Highlight how our weird reviews (both good and bad) fit exactly into this bin (absolutely mis-interpreting a table, inventing a bacterial species we didnā€™t use and talking shit about it, miscounting our team members, etc)

    Weā€™ll be leaning on the Stochastic Parrot paper pretty hard, because itā€™s a good entry into the field on the skeptical side and is just well constructed in general. Iā€™m also on the hunt simplified diagram for how LLMs convert tokens to arrays to tokens from the original transformer literature. Unfortunately, so much of the literature is obscurantist on purpose, and I want to avoid falling into the ā€œIt canā€™t be that stupidā€ trap. Any pointers in that direction are most welcome!

    Wish us luck, heh!

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      good luck! it sounds like youā€™re coming in remarkably well-prepared, so unless theyā€™re gonna go fingers-in-ears (and it sounds like the PMā€™s better than that), youā€™re at least likely to make an impact

      Unfortunately, so much of the literature is obscurantist on purpose

      between this and all the SEO on OpenAIā€™s marketing horseshit and breathlessly parroted press releases, itā€™s exhausting to find good sources for how any of this stuff actually works in reality. shit, Iā€™ve had old primary sources on things like Sora get buried after OpenAIā€™s promises didnā€™t pan out. Iā€™m hoping you can find what you need ā€” our back archives might have a few links if you havenā€™t searched through here yet.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Pretty good sneer there:

      BREAKING: Tim Pool announces he will be stepping back from full time content production to look after his family. He states heā€™s tired of being made fun of for not having a wife and kids so he will also be using the extra time to pursue acquiring that family

      • corbin@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        Itā€™s almost completely ineffective, sorry. Itā€™s certainly not as effective as exfiltrating weights via neighborly means.

        On Glaze and Nightshade, my prior rant hasnā€™t yet been invalidated and thereā€™s no upcoming mathematics which tilt the scales in favor of anti-training techniques. In general, scrapers for training sets are now augmented with alignment models, which test inputs to see how well the tags line up; your example might be rejected as insufficiently normal-cat-like.

        I think that ā€œforce-feedingā€ is probably not the right metaphor. At scale, more effort goes into cleaning and tagging than into scraping; most of that ā€œforcedā€ input is destined to be discarded or retagged.

        • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          yeah this is the thing Iā€™ve been thinking a lot about

          fucking reCaptcha is literally mass-weaponising users for data filtration, and there is no good counter besides just not using reCaptcha (which is something one canā€™t easily pull off without things like regulatory action, massive reputational problems that make people gtfo, etc)

          I have similar worries about cloudflare being such a massive chokepoint and using that position to enable ā€œai bot filterā€ services. feels extremely monopolistic, but ianal and Iā€™m not entirely sure what the case grounds/structure on that would be (if any)

          the only other viable strategy at the moment is fully breaking contact with any potential bad traffic systems, and thatā€™s extremely fucking dire because thatā€™s yet another nail in the coffin of the increasingly less open internet

          • bitofhope@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            3 months ago

            The whole Cloudflare bot detection is so weird and eerie. Iā€™ve had issues where I canā€™t get past it presumably just because Iā€™m using some in-application browser just to get a login cookie, but other times it just lets fucking curl through no questions asked.

            • flavia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              3 months ago

              it just lets fucking curl through no questions asked

              Fucking what. Iā€™ve heard of sites blocking curl and Iā€™ve been able to get around it by copying user agent and sometimes cookies from the browser. Now Iā€™m cursed with the knowledge that I could probably just scrape stuff from everywhere

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        I saw people say they would add 10% opaque layers of the musk with Epsteinā€™s accomplice (whos name i forgot for a second and too lazy to look her up) photo. Would be nice if there was a tool to do so automatically. (Not that i post on twitter anymore).

        • swlabr@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          tbh that sounds like a pretty easy script to write! Too bad I am not near a computer rn

          • bitofhope@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            3 months ago

            I got nerd sniped into trying to resize felons_musk_and_maxwell.webp to the same size as some base image before compositing it on top with a 10% dissolve in the same magick invocation but I need to sleep so Iā€™m giving up for now.

    • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      I thought they were gonna do that themselves by feeding on their own outputs littered all over the www. Maybe they can use some help.

    • antifuchs@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      They added sleeps to training jobs? Sounds like they deserve a raise for improving energy efficiency insteadā€¦

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The Bookseller: Penguin Random House underscores copyright protection in AI rebuff

    Penguin Random House (PRH) has amended its copyright wording across all imprints globally, confirming it will appear ā€œin imprint pages across our marketsā€. The new wording states: ā€œNo part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training artificial intelligence technologies or systemsā€, and will be included in all new titles and any backlist titles that are reprinted.

    Now that the content mafia has realized GenAI isnā€™t gonna let them get rid of all the expensive and troublesome human talent. itā€™s time to give Big AI a wedgie.

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Itā€™s weird how rarely I see people point this, but in theory this kind of boilerplate should be technically meaningless. If copyright protections include the privilege to use the work for training a machine learning algorithm, you need explicit permission anyway. OTOH if itā€™s fair use or otherwise not something copyright law is concerned with, the copyright holderā€™s objection doesnā€™t matter.

      For the record, I think AI models are derivative works and thus theyā€™re not only infringing on typical ā€œall rights reservedā€ works, but also things such as Free software whose license terms require attribution if used in derivative work, and especially share-alike copyleft licensed work.

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        I thinkt itā€™s pretty well-lknown that Spotify got all its initial music from Oink. They moved fast, got dominant, and were able to present the record labels with a big audience prepared to pay for streaming music. The labels quickly ensured theyā€™d get the lionā€™s share of that revenue.

        OpenAI and friends tried the same thing - scrape everything, build AGI, reap the rewards. Except it didnā€™t work, and theyā€™re in a much worse position morally. Even if they can get a judgement that what theyā€™re doing is legal, it will cost them a lot in litigation fees, coupled with the public perception that these culture vampires are ripping off the poor honest author. Not a good place to be in.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Now that the content mafia has realized GenAI isnā€™t gonna let them get rid of all the expensive and troublesome human talent. itā€™s time to give Big AI a wedgie.

      Considering the massive(ly inflated) valuations running around Big AI and the massive amounts of stolen work that powers the likes of CrAIyon, ChatGPT, DALL-E and others, I suspect the content mafia is likely gonna try and squeeze every last red cent they can out of the AI industry.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        At some point, something is going to reveal that all the money in AI has gone into power costs for datacenters and NVidia chips and that the AI companies themselves arenā€™t doing so hot. I hope itā€™s the discovery process for some of the inevitable lawsuits.

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      who does this? I love audiobooks, but Iā€™ve put them down when the narrator didnā€™t work for me. Who wants everything to sound like itā€™s being read by a serial killer?

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        It looks like an AI-powered fiction version of this scam. On one hand being fiction means that itā€™s less likely to actively risk killing people with phony medical advice. But being AI powered means that the grifters can now cut the underpaid gig workers out of the loop entirely, which is probably the most concrete example of AI displacing human workers Iā€™ve yet seen.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      lmao incredible

      Then thereā€™s BenevolentAI. I first wrote about them in 2018, as the company stated that it had ā€œcreated a bioscience machine brain, purpose-built to discover new medicines and cures for disease.ā€ Howā€™s the machine brain doing these days? Well, the companyā€™s lead program failed in the clinic last year, and in April announced major layoffs.

      just who buys this shit? this reads like refined crypto nonsense

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        People who donā€™t get much tech/overdose on hype and heard of alphafold. Imagine how much worse things could be now after the Nobel.

          • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            3 months ago

            Given the past several decades of trickle-up economics, I think we havenā€™t seen anything close to the bottom of the well of basically-idle capital seeking unrealistic returns.

            Iā€™d go so far as to say that the current crop of bubbles possibly represents the greatest downards wealth transfer (albeit from billionaires to millionaires rather than, yā€™know, working people) since the second world war, but I havenā€™t done anything near the amount of research necessary for that to be more than exciting rhetoric.

  • flizzo@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    Look out, professional Nix crybaby Jon Ringer is back with his fork.

    In other news, I have my own as well called Borkfan, absolutely not a ban fork due to my having threatened multiple people, but instead dedicated to the idea that a technology that lacks chud approval must necessarily not be in the true hacker spirit.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      literally the exact crowd shitting on the mere rumor of a Lix NixOS fork are clapping for this like trained seals. and I donā€™t think this getting announced right after those rumors is an accident ā€” it gets Jon the most attention for his low-effort bullshit and might even let him hurt another fork by way of community fragmentation

      something Iā€™m confused about is, is Ringer even effectively banned anymore? I stopped monitoring when someone with mod privileges unbanned him from a bunch of Nix community spaces. is he back to banned, or is this just a continuing tantrum from Jon having Release Manager stripped from him and given to someone who could do that incredibly thoroughly automated job without stirring up a fucking hate mob?

      • o7___o7@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Is their branding dominated an anime girl of ambiguous age?

        Just guessing, I promise I havenā€™t checked.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        there is one silver lining: for once, I donā€™t have the cognitive load of another Nix fork to carefully consider switching to. thereā€™s no way in fuck Iā€™m using Ringerā€™s fork under any circumstances, and my brain already filed it away under ā€œweird name, starts with an E, donā€™t remember the restā€ seconds after I closed the tab

        • flizzo@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          Youā€™re right, Borkfan is too easy to remember, my not-ban fork is now called Frabnok.

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            3 months ago
            > FRABNOK LANTERN
            
            Your lantern explodes into a rant about the wokes, killing you instantly.
            
            *** You have died ***
            
            Your score is 0 out of a possible 10 points, in 1 move. This gives you the rank of Release Manager.