Stanford law professor Mark Lemley, a partner at Lex Lumina, is withdrawing from the Kadrey v. Meta case over Meta training its Llama LLM on copyrighted material. Heās āfired Meta as a clientā becaā¦
Stanford law professor Mark Lemley, a partner at Lex Lumina, is withdrawing from the Kadrey v. Meta case over Meta training its Llama LLM on copyrighted material. Heās āfired Meta as a clientā because Mark Zuckerberg has gone full āNeo-Naziā: [LinkedIn]
I have struggled with how to respond to Mark Zuckerberg and Facebookās descent into toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness ā¦ I cannot in good conscience serve as their lawyer any longer.
So did Rogan ask Zuck to be on the show, or did Zuck ask Rogan?
Almost certainly the latter. Rogan has forged a remarkable career in legitimizing authoritarianism, and heās never been more valuable to oligarchs than now.
Iāve been thinking on this a lot. Itās genuinely amazing and deeply disturbing how innocuous he seems to people who arenāt aware of what he actually is.
I think heās been able to market himself to his most ideologically aligned audience as a smaller deal than he really is, despite having the highest-possible profile guests on his show.
For better or for worse this man and his show will be studied for years to come. As someone who was an occasional listener back before the mask-off phase I have so many thoughts on the guy.
I think one thing to understand is that most of his casual audience very likely engages through watching clips, not sitting through whole interviews. The reasonable, mainstreamable stuff gets clipped out and perhaps you run across it sarching for something else, or itās algorithmically fed to you because of your interest in an adjacent topic. Clips of the weirder, creepier manosphere/Alex Jones/Art Bell guests donāt get surfaced as readily, at least until youāre down the rabbit hole, so Rogan himself ends up having a veneer of reasonability and respectability that he doesnāt really deserve.
Same goes for Trump rallies, or probably almost any major political speech now. Thereās a front line of people who will watch the whole thing, but then they recirculate specific clips based on how they want to portray the subject.
nah his MOST ideologically aligned audience is made up of actual zealots. my dad was literally screaming at me, āheās got the most popular show in the world! heās a big deal!ā because i said i didnāt think joe was a smart guy the other night.
the context was, of course, vaccine skepticism. heās really just diet alex jones, but since heās popular i guess thereās no issue there?
Yeah I donāt even know why I wrote that. I think I mean something more like general audiences that are likely to find more points in common with the opinions on the show than points theyād object to.
People who donāt view themselves as political? Not sure.
A large swath of people will think youāre overreacting if you say something like āJoe Rogan is putting a friendly face on disastrous misinformation for millions of trusting listeners all over the world.ā or its much milder cousin āThis guy has uncritically nodded along to a lot of bullshit his friends have said on air, I canāt listen to this anymore, I think itās weird that you still do.ā
Nothing says free thinker like having very particular opinions on irrelevant US current events from across the planet that just so happen to line up with one of the most famous corporate mouthpieces since Oprah.
iām so consistently bummed out that duncan trussell loves him so much, but iām pretty sure they were friends a while before he really started down this road.
like fuck, iāve got some shitty friends. and i would probably also call em out a lot less if they were giving me an enormous fucking platform to just dick around with for funsies.
heās lowkey on my shitlist until he makes midnight gospel season 2 happen tho. i refuse to believe there isnāt a SINGLE streamer interested. pitch it to chick-fil-a or something, cāmon!
Thatās a headline that needs sorting
So did Rogan ask Zuck to be on the show, or did Zuck ask Rogan?
Almost certainly the latter. Rogan has forged a remarkable career in legitimizing authoritarianism, and heās never been more valuable to oligarchs than now.
Iāve been thinking on this a lot. Itās genuinely amazing and deeply disturbing how innocuous he seems to people who arenāt aware of what he actually is.
I think heās been able to market himself to his most ideologically aligned audience as a smaller deal than he really is, despite having the highest-possible profile guests on his show.
For better or for worse this man and his show will be studied for years to come. As someone who was an occasional listener back before the mask-off phase I have so many thoughts on the guy.
I think one thing to understand is that most of his casual audience very likely engages through watching clips, not sitting through whole interviews. The reasonable, mainstreamable stuff gets clipped out and perhaps you run across it sarching for something else, or itās algorithmically fed to you because of your interest in an adjacent topic. Clips of the weirder, creepier manosphere/Alex Jones/Art Bell guests donāt get surfaced as readily, at least until youāre down the rabbit hole, so Rogan himself ends up having a veneer of reasonability and respectability that he doesnāt really deserve.
Same goes for Trump rallies, or probably almost any major political speech now. Thereās a front line of people who will watch the whole thing, but then they recirculate specific clips based on how they want to portray the subject.
nah his MOST ideologically aligned audience is made up of actual zealots. my dad was literally screaming at me, āheās got the most popular show in the world! heās a big deal!ā because i said i didnāt think joe was a smart guy the other night.
the context was, of course, vaccine skepticism. heās really just diet alex jones, but since heās popular i guess thereās no issue there?
iām so tired yāall.
Yeah I donāt even know why I wrote that. I think I mean something more like general audiences that are likely to find more points in common with the opinions on the show than points theyād object to.
People who donāt view themselves as political? Not sure.
A large swath of people will think youāre overreacting if you say something like āJoe Rogan is putting a friendly face on disastrous misinformation for millions of trusting listeners all over the world.ā or its much milder cousin āThis guy has uncritically nodded along to a lot of bullshit his friends have said on air, I canāt listen to this anymore, I think itās weird that you still do.ā
Nothing says free thinker like having very particular opinions on irrelevant US current events from across the planet that just so happen to line up with one of the most famous corporate mouthpieces since Oprah.
iām so consistently bummed out that duncan trussell loves him so much, but iām pretty sure they were friends a while before he really started down this road.
like fuck, iāve got some shitty friends. and i would probably also call em out a lot less if they were giving me an enormous fucking platform to just dick around with for funsies.
heās lowkey on my shitlist until he makes midnight gospel season 2 happen tho. i refuse to believe there isnāt a SINGLE streamer interested. pitch it to chick-fil-a or something, cāmon!
really? the impact to your media consumption patterns and preferences is the biggest problem you have here?
seriously?
oof.