Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

    • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yud be like: "kek you absolute rubes. ofc I simply meant AI would be like a super accountant. I didnā€™t literally mean it would be able to analyze govā€™t waste from studying the flow of matter at the molecular levelā€¦ heh, I was just kiddingā€¦ unless šŸ„ŗ ? "

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      He retweeted somebody saying this:

      The cheat code to reading Yudkowsky- at least if youā€™re not doing death-of-the-author stuff- is that he believes the AI doom stuff with completely literal sincerity. To borrow Orwellā€™s formulation, he believes in it the way he believes in China.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        1 day ago

        That thread is quite something, going from ā€œyud is extraordinarily thorough (much more thorough than i could possibly be) in examining the ground directly below a streetlamp, in his search for his keysā€, that ā€˜he believes it like he believes in Chinaā€™ to ā€˜honestly, i should be reading him. we have starkly different spiritual premises- and i smugly presume my spiritual premises are informed by better epistemologyā€™

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      ā€œjudge every moleculeā€ and ā€œsimulation hypothesisā€ probably have a bit of a fling going

      • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        ā€œThe AI is attuned to every molecular vibration and can reconstruct you by extrapolation from a piece of fairy cakeā€ is a necessary premise of the Basilisk that theyā€™ve spent all that time saying they donā€™t believe in.

        • istewart@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          Quantum computing will enable the AGI to entangle with all surrounding molecular vibrations! I saw another press release today

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            Ā·
            1 day ago

            ah, the novel QC RSA attack: shaking the algorithm so much it gets annoyed and gives up the plaintext out of desperation